The question in Brooke-Willbanks v. Flatland Mineral Fund LP, et al was which party to a Texas mineral deed would bear the burden of two previously reserved nonparticipating royalty interests.
The facts
Kay Brooke-Wilbanks owned a 45/100 mineral interest in
The takeaway from Hahn v. ConocoPhillips Company is that in Texas a NPRI holder may not diminish his rights by ratifying …
The question in Kim R. Smith Logging Inc. v. Indigo Minerals LLC was whether a disgruntled Louisiana royalty owner sent …
Precious little legal analysis is required to grasp the lesson from Springbok Royalty Partners v. Cook. No mode or manner of legal gymnastics is likely to save parties from the legal effect of a contract they didn’t bother to read
Cryptocurrency is in the news of late. Its relationship with Texas energy is …
Wagner v. Exxon Mobil Corporation is an example of the misfortune that can befall …
Texas law does not allow an oil and gas lessee to rely on a cotenant’s production …
The principal contention in the tax refund case of Exxon v. United States was whether …
The threat of melting Antarctic glaciers is not as portrayed in overhyped news …
